GitHub Standard¶
Version: 1.1.0
Status: Active
Owner: Rafael da Silva Guerra
Purpose¶
This document defines how GitHub is used across W7 repositories: branching, commits, issues, pull requests and repository hygiene. It makes concrete the claim, made in Knowledge Architecture, that GitHub is the official source of truth.
Context¶
"GitHub is the source of truth" only means something if it is used consistently — the same branch conventions, the same commit style, the same expectations for what is public versus private. This document is what makes that claim operational rather than aspirational.
Repository Conventions¶
- Every repository under the W7 ecosystem has a
README.mdat its root stating its purpose and, if it is an initiative or product repository, which initiative it belongs to (per the Initiative Framework). - Every repository has a
LICENSEappropriate to its intended openness — chosen deliberately, not left as a default. mainis always in a working, documentation-consistent state. Work in progress happens on branches, not directly announced as finished onmain.
Branching¶
- Branch names describe the work:
feature/<name>,fix/<name>,docs/<name>,refactor/<name>. - Long-lived branches are the exception, not the default — they are a sign that a decision is either large enough to need an ADR first, or should be broken into smaller pieces.
Commits¶
Commits follow Conventional Commits: type(scope): summary, matching the Engineering Standard. When the reason is not clear from the summary and surrounding decision record, the commit body explains why, not merely what — the diff already shows what changed.
Pull Requests¶
- A pull request description states what changed and why, not just what files were touched.
- Changes to
docs/foundations/,docs/identity/,docs/framework/,docs/architecture/ordocs/standards/are called out explicitly in the description, since they can affect every initiative that inherits from them. - A pull request is small enough to review in one sitting whenever the work allows it to be.
Issues¶
Issues are used for tracked, unfinished work — not as a substitute for documentation. Once resolved, the decision behind a significant issue belongs in an ADR or in the relevant standard, not only in a closed issue thread that is hard to discover later.
Visibility¶
A repository's visibility (public/private) is a deliberate choice, revisited when circumstances change (see the status table in the root README.md), not an accident of how it was first created. Nothing that would violate the Information Boundaries standard is ever made public by mistake because it was assumed to be private by default.
Automation¶
Continuous integration (GitHub Actions) is used for verifiable, repeatable checks — building the documentation site, running tests, linting — never as a substitute for the review practices in the Engineering Standard.
Related Documents¶
- Documentation Standard — what every document must contain before it is committed
- Engineering Standard — the practices this standard makes concrete on GitHub specifically
- Information Boundaries — what does and does not belong in a public repository
- Technology Stack — why GitHub was chosen, and its replaceability